A Charitable giving by individuals

نویسندگان

  • Jurgen Grotz
  • Andrew van Doorn
  • Andrew Orton
  • Sarabajaya Kumar
چکیده

Origins and consequences of charitable confidence are investigated with the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey 2002-2004 (n=1,246). Charitable confidence is higher among the higher educated, children of volunteers, younger age groups, those with more faith in people, those who are aware of standards of excellence for fundraising organizations, and among persons with altruistic and joy-of-giving motives for philanthropy. In a regression analysis, the relationship of confidence with philanthropy is found to be moderately strong. The relationship is strongest for donations to organizations that deal with social problems that are difficult to solve, like poverty, illness, and violation of human rights. Beliefs about program spending and irritation about fundraising campaigns confidence partly explain why confidence matters for philanthropy, especially for those with altruistic motives for giving. Why confidence is important for philanthropy Few characteristics are more typical of donors than their confidence in charitable organizations. The Independent Sector (2002) reports that those who have high confidence in charities give about 50% more than those who have low confidence. Another study showed that among donors, loss of confidence is often reported as a reason to stop giving to particular charities. More than 40% of Dutch donors report that they have stopped giving to charities at least once (Consumentenbond, 2005). However, little is known about the origins and consequences of charitable confidence (Sargeant & Lee, 2001). It remains unclear how strong the effects of confidence actually are relative to other factors, and where confidence comes from. Therefore, this paper tests hypotheses on the origins and consequences of charitable confidence. Data and methods The questions above are addressed using data from the first two waves of the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey (2002-2004; n=1246). The GINPS is a web-based computer assisted self interview. Respondents are drawn from a pool of approximately 70,000 individuals who regularly participate in poll surveys. The fieldwork took place in May 2002 and May 2004. There are fourteen dependent variables in the analyses below: charitable confidence, irritation about fundraising, perceived spending on programs, and donations fundraising organizations in ten different sectors. Charitable donations were measured in both waves with extensive survey modules (called ‘Method-Area’ modules by Rooney, Steinberg & Schervish, 2004). In the second wave, charitable confidence was measured on a 1-5 scale (ranging from ‘none at all’ to ‘very much’) with the question: “How much confidence do you have in charities?”. One in three respondents reported ‘quite some’ or ‘very much’ confidence, about one in two reported ‘some’ confidence and about one in five reported little confidence or none at all (see table 1). In a bivariate analysis, charitable confidence is strongly related to the amount donated. Disregarding the extreme groups for the moment because of their small size, the differences are still very large. Those who report little or no confidence give on average €130 per year, which is 50% less than those with some confidence (€257). Those with quite some or very much confidence (€393) give 50% more than those with some confidence. The

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Who gives ? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving . Part Two : Gender , family composition and income

This is the second of two articles in which we present a comprehensive review of the multidisciplinary academic literature on philanthropy. In this article, we identify the following predictors of charitable giving by individuals and/or households: gender, family composition and income. For each predictor, we discuss the evidence for the mechanisms that may explain why the predictor is correlat...

متن کامل

Do charitable subsidies crowd out political giving ? The missing link between charitable and political contributions by Bar ı ş

In the United States, charitable contributions can be deducted from taxable income making the price of giving inversely related to the marginal tax rate. However, several other types of contributions such as donations to political organizations are not tax deductible. This paper investigates the spillover effects of charitable subsidies on political giving using five independent surveys of char...

متن کامل

Do charitable subsidies crowd out political giving? The missing link between charitable and political contributions

In the United States, charitable contributions can be deducted from taxable income making the price of giving inversely related to the marginal tax rate. However, several other types of contributions such as donations to political organizations are not tax deductible. This paper investigates the spillover effects of charitable subsidies on political giving using five independent surveys of char...

متن کامل

Charitable giving and reflexive individuals: How personal reflexivity mediates between structure and agency

This article examines how individuals are reflexive beings who interpret the world in relation to things that matter to them, and how charitable acts are evaluated and embedded in their lives with different degrees of meaning and importance. Rather than framing the discussion of charitable practices in terms of an altruism/egoism binary or imputing motivations and values to social structures, t...

متن کامل

Demand for Giving to Multiple Charities: Theory and Experiments

We study how competition among charities affects individuals’ giving behavior. We characterize a situation where a higher rebate subsidy shifts donations from one charity to another and increases total donations. We conduct two experiments: (i) individualized charitable giving where free riding incentives are shut down; and (ii) multi-donor charitable giving. We derive the demand for giving at ...

متن کامل

Pay or pray? The impact of charitable subsidies on religious attendance

The economic argument for subsidizing charitable giving relies on the positive externalities of charitable activities, particularly from the religious institutions that are the largest recipients of giving. But the net external effects of subsidies to religious giving will also depend on a potentially important indirect effect as well: impacts on religious participation. Religious participation...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006